<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Movie Mavericks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moviemavericks.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moviemavericks.com</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Stallone becomes 1st Movie Star to Headline #1 Openings in last 5 Decades &#8211; News by Rajan</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542&#038;cpage=1#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542#comment-3439</guid>
		<description>i am sure a certain harrison ford will equal that record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am sure a certain harrison ford will equal that record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DIY Film Distribution: How Albert Pyun Is Ditching The Studios by Trevor (T)</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=1665&#038;cpage=1#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor (T)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=1665#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Nice catch, thanks! My brain apparently wasn&#039;t working right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch, thanks! My brain apparently wasn&#8217;t working right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DIY Film Distribution: How Albert Pyun Is Ditching The Studios by helga</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=1665&#038;cpage=1#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>helga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=1665#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>You spelled pseudo wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spelled pseudo wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stallone becomes 1st Movie Star to Headline #1 Openings in last 5 Decades &#8211; News by Just my two cents</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542&#038;cpage=1#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Just my two cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>What I think the original poster is saying goes back to the old millennium argument. Since there was never a year zero, each decade begins with a one. In other words from 2001 to 2010 is all a part of one decade. Thus making the assertion four decades correct. But don&#039;t worry, Sly has ten more years to try and make this headline come true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think the original poster is saying goes back to the old millennium argument. Since there was never a year zero, each decade begins with a one. In other words from 2001 to 2010 is all a part of one decade. Thus making the assertion four decades correct. But don&#8217;t worry, Sly has ten more years to try and make this headline come true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stallone becomes 1st Movie Star to Headline #1 Openings in last 5 Decades &#8211; News by thisguy</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542&#038;cpage=1#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>thisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>The 1970s is a decade.
The 1980s is a decade.
The 1990s is a decade.
The 2000s is a decade.
The 2010s is a decade.

Stallone had a number 1 movie in each one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1970s is a decade.<br />
The 1980s is a decade.<br />
The 1990s is a decade.<br />
The 2000s is a decade.<br />
The 2010s is a decade.</p>
<p>Stallone had a number 1 movie in each one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stallone becomes 1st Movie Star to Headline #1 Openings in last 5 Decades &#8211; News by clarkthek</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542&#038;cpage=1#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>clarkthek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2542#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>uh... That&#039;s four decades guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230; That&#8217;s four decades guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Baseball Movies by Baseball</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2065&#038;cpage=1#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2065#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>What a crap list!!!

Bull Durham isn&#039;t even on the list and it is easily number #1.

Where is The Natural???

The Fan absolutely sucked.

Bad list!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a crap list!!!</p>
<p>Bull Durham isn&#8217;t even on the list and it is easily number #1.</p>
<p>Where is The Natural???</p>
<p>The Fan absolutely sucked.</p>
<p>Bad list!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animated Critics Ep 7: The Perception of Inception by Veronica Dial</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2527&#038;cpage=1#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica Dial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2527#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>What a load on nonsense. It&#039;s like these two &#039;critics&#039; decided to pan the film in order to show that they weren&#039;t sucked. Pretentious fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load on nonsense. It&#8217;s like these two &#8216;critics&#8217; decided to pan the film in order to show that they weren&#8217;t sucked. Pretentious fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Other Guys (2010) &#8211; Review by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2531&#038;cpage=1#comment-2775</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2531#comment-2775</guid>
		<description> I consider myself somewhat of a movie buff so I really wanted to check your site out. Now, onto the film being reviewed... The Other Guys. I really, really ... and let me emphasize REALLY thought it was bad.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, Will Ferrell was hilarious as usual and played a GREAT role (especially the &#039;Gator&#039; scenes) but as you mentioned Wahlberg was lost in the shuffle. Ugh.  He was downright unbearable to watch.  His attempt at comedy made me want to repeatedly slam my head against my arm rest. Thankfully I refrained.  But seriously, he must have uttered the phrase &quot;SHUT UP!&quot; to Ferrell about 20+ times throughout.  I hated to hate Wahlberg in this.  Sam Jackson and The Rock were just a little too over the top for me, They set a tone that I really couldn&#039;t get with.  I know the best way to view comedies is with a large group of friends, and maybe this was part of the reason why I really did not enjoy it.  I saw it with one friend, and this particular friend is a bit of a milquetoast .... well, he&#039;s just downright dull. Anyway i thought Get Him to the Greek blew The Other Guys out of the water by a mile.  My dull buddy saw Greek without me and claimed he did not think it was very funny.  So maybe its all that bastard&#039;s fault that I didn&#039;t like The Other Guys.  I look forward to reading your other reviews s this was the first I checked out, I like the fact that you review older movies as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider myself somewhat of a movie buff so I really wanted to check your site out. Now, onto the film being reviewed&#8230; The Other Guys. I really, really &#8230; and let me emphasize REALLY thought it was bad.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Will Ferrell was hilarious as usual and played a GREAT role (especially the &#8216;Gator&#8217; scenes) but as you mentioned Wahlberg was lost in the shuffle. Ugh.  He was downright unbearable to watch.  His attempt at comedy made me want to repeatedly slam my head against my arm rest. Thankfully I refrained.  But seriously, he must have uttered the phrase &#8220;SHUT UP!&#8221; to Ferrell about 20+ times throughout.  I hated to hate Wahlberg in this.  Sam Jackson and The Rock were just a little too over the top for me, They set a tone that I really couldn&#8217;t get with.  I know the best way to view comedies is with a large group of friends, and maybe this was part of the reason why I really did not enjoy it.  I saw it with one friend, and this particular friend is a bit of a milquetoast &#8230;. well, he&#8217;s just downright dull. Anyway i thought Get Him to the Greek blew The Other Guys out of the water by a mile.  My dull buddy saw Greek without me and claimed he did not think it was very funny.  So maybe its all that bastard&#8217;s fault that I didn&#8217;t like The Other Guys.  I look forward to reading your other reviews s this was the first I checked out, I like the fact that you review older movies as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on B.O. Aug 20-22, 2010 by Trevor (T)</title>
		<link>http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2551&#038;cpage=1#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor (T)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviemavericks.com/?p=2551#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t argue with the tomato meter, but I should have been clearer on what I meant by WOM - it was what I was personally hearing from a lot of people, and reading on internet forums. I don&#039;t think that good gross necessarily means a movie has good wom, there could be many factors driving people to see something, and in this summer&#039;s movie marketplace I&#039;ve found that I can&#039;t trust wom good or bad. To be honest though I suppose I&#039;d day this season had a ton of extremely bad films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t argue with the tomato meter, but I should have been clearer on what I meant by WOM &#8211; it was what I was personally hearing from a lot of people, and reading on internet forums. I don&#8217;t think that good gross necessarily means a movie has good wom, there could be many factors driving people to see something, and in this summer&#8217;s movie marketplace I&#8217;ve found that I can&#8217;t trust wom good or bad. To be honest though I suppose I&#8217;d day this season had a ton of extremely bad films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
